Most Popular Baby Names of the 1900s
Across the 1900s, Mary was the most popular girls' name, given to 161,504 babies, and John led the boys with 84,590.
That's out of 2,927,552 girls and 1,357,571 boys counted between 1900 and 1909, under 3,829 different girls' names and 2,489 boys' names.
Number one, year by year
| Year | Girls | Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 1900 | Mary | John |
| 1901 | Mary | John |
| 1902 | Mary | John |
| 1903 | Mary | John |
| 1904 | Mary | John |
| 1905 | Mary | John |
| 1906 | Mary | John |
| 1907 | Mary | John |
| 1908 | Mary | John |
| 1909 | Mary | John |
Top 100 names of the 1900s
| Rank | Name | Babies | vs 1890s |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary | 161,504 | same |
| 2 | Helen | 69,428 | up 2 |
| 3 | Margaret | 57,919 | same |
| 4 | Anna | 54,918 | down 2 |
| 5 | Ruth | 51,010 | up 1 |
| 6 | Elizabeth | 41,708 | down 1 |
| 7 | Dorothy | 39,112 | up 50 |
| 8 | Marie | 37,091 | up 2 |
| 9 | Florence | 36,191 | down 2 |
| 10 | Mildred | 36,173 | up 32 |
| 11 | Alice | 35,232 | up 4 |
| 12 | Ethel | 34,868 | down 4 |
| 13 | Lillian | 32,519 | up 3 |
| 14 | Gladys | 30,285 | up 29 |
| 15 | Edna | 29,832 | up 2 |
| 16 | Frances | 28,499 | up 11 |
| 17 | Rose | 28,106 | up 5 |
| 18 | Annie | 27,748 | up 1 |
| 19 | Grace | 26,927 | down 1 |
| 20 | Bertha | 24,247 | down 8 |
| 21 | Emma | 24,176 | down 12 |
| 22 | Bessie | 23,984 | down 8 |
| 23 | Clara | 23,899 | down 12 |
| 24 | Hazel | 23,802 | down 1 |
| 25 | Irene | 23,656 | up 19 |
| 26 | Gertrude | 23,607 | down 2 |
| 27 | Louise | 22,862 | up 9 |
| 28 | Catherine | 22,006 | up 10 |
| 29 | Martha | 21,750 | down 4 |
| 30 | Mabel | 21,625 | down 10 |
| 31 | Pearl | 20,913 | down 5 |
| 32 | Edith | 20,884 | down 3 |
| 33 | Esther | 20,026 | up 4 |
| 34 | Minnie | 19,715 | down 21 |
| 35 | Myrtle | 19,691 | down 7 |
| 36 | Ida | 18,866 | down 15 |
| 37 | Josephine | 18,785 | up 12 |
| 38 | Evelyn | 18,603 | up 52 |
| 39 | Elsie | 18,452 | down 4 |
| 40 | Eva | 18,357 | down 7 |
| 41 | Thelma | 18,265 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 42 | Ruby | 18,175 | up 24 |
| 43 | Agnes | 17,616 | down 4 |
| 44 | Sarah | 17,342 | down 13 |
| 45 | Viola | 16,559 | up 20 |
| 46 | Nellie | 16,339 | down 16 |
| 47 | Beatrice | 16,282 | up 24 |
| 48 | Julia | 16,107 | down 3 |
| 49 | Laura | 15,532 | down 15 |
| 50 | Lillie | 15,391 | down 9 |
| 51 | Lucille | 15,041 | up 48 |
| 52 | Ella | 14,763 | down 20 |
| 53 | Virginia | 14,539 | up 34 |
| 54 | Mattie | 13,837 | down 4 |
| 55 | Pauline | 13,310 | up 24 |
| 56 | Carrie | 13,140 | down 16 |
| 57 | Alma | 13,092 | down 3 |
| 58 | Jessie | 12,756 | down 6 |
| 59 | Mae | 12,711 | down 4 |
| 60 | Lena | 12,703 | down 12 |
| 61 | Willie | 12,357 | up 14 |
| 62 | Katherine | 12,105 | up 2 |
| 63 | Blanche | 11,730 | down 7 |
| 64 | Hattie | 11,717 | down 18 |
| 65 | Marion | 11,713 | up 9 |
| 66 | Lucy | 11,020 | down 7 |
| 67 | Stella | 11,014 | down 4 |
| 68 | Mamie | 10,618 | down 7 |
| 69 | Vera | 10,457 | up 14 |
| 70 | Cora | 10,372 | down 23 |
| 71 | Fannie | 10,346 | down 9 |
| 72 | Eleanor | 10,030 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 73 | Bernice | 10,010 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 74 | Jennie | 9,988 | down 23 |
| 75 | Ann | 9,932 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 76 | Leona | 9,848 | up 24 |
| 77 | Beulah | 9,716 | up 1 |
| 78 | Lula | 9,518 | down 18 |
| 79 | Rosa | 9,297 | down 9 |
| 80 | Ada | 9,121 | down 22 |
| 81 | Ellen | 8,339 | down 9 |
| 82 | Kathryn | 8,333 | up 7 |
| 83 | Maggie | 8,289 | down 15 |
| 84 | Doris | 8,252 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 85 | Dora | 8,011 | down 18 |
| 86 | Betty | 7,921 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 87 | Marguerite | 7,912 | down 3 |
| 88 | Violet | 7,844 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 89 | Lois | 7,691 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 90 | Daisy | 7,687 | down 5 |
| 91 | Anne | 7,615 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 92 | Sadie | 7,461 | down 19 |
| 93 | Susie | 7,312 | down 12 |
| 94 | Nora | 7,172 | down 25 |
| 95 | Georgia | 7,142 | same |
| 96 | Maude | 7,142 | down 43 |
| 97 | Marjorie | 7,025 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 98 | Opal | 6,791 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 99 | Hilda | 6,783 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 100 | Velma | 6,558 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| Rank | Name | Babies | vs 1890s |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John | 84,590 | same |
| 2 | William | 69,320 | same |
| 3 | James | 62,170 | same |
| 4 | George | 43,589 | same |
| 5 | Charles | 36,184 | same |
| 6 | Robert | 35,849 | up 2 |
| 7 | Joseph | 35,173 | down 1 |
| 8 | Frank | 29,046 | down 1 |
| 9 | Edward | 24,516 | same |
| 10 | Thomas | 21,783 | up 2 |
| 11 | Henry | 21,772 | down 1 |
| 12 | Walter | 19,997 | up 1 |
| 13 | Harry | 17,906 | down 2 |
| 14 | Willie | 17,746 | up 4 |
| 15 | Arthur | 15,409 | down 1 |
| 16 | Albert | 15,318 | same |
| 17 | Clarence | 13,573 | same |
| 18 | Fred | 13,076 | down 3 |
| 19 | Harold | 12,795 | up 12 |
| 20 | Paul | 12,636 | up 2 |
| 21 | Raymond | 11,650 | up 5 |
| 22 | Richard | 10,675 | up 5 |
| 23 | Roy | 10,632 | down 4 |
| 24 | Joe | 10,466 | up 4 |
| 25 | Louis | 10,372 | down 5 |
| 26 | Carl | 9,865 | down 3 |
| 27 | Ralph | 9,298 | up 5 |
| 28 | Earl | 9,251 | down 7 |
| 29 | Jack | 9,222 | up 15 |
| 30 | Ernest | 8,657 | down 6 |
| 31 | David | 8,619 | down 2 |
| 32 | Samuel | 8,149 | down 7 |
| 33 | Howard | 8,014 | same |
| 34 | Charlie | 7,928 | down 4 |
| 35 | Francis | 7,021 | up 11 |
| 36 | Herbert | 6,957 | down 1 |
| 37 | Lawrence | 6,846 | up 8 |
| 38 | Theodore | 6,490 | up 45 |
| 39 | Alfred | 6,356 | same |
| 40 | Andrew | 6,277 | down 6 |
| 41 | Elmer | 6,161 | down 5 |
| 42 | Sam | 6,161 | same |
| 43 | Eugene | 5,909 | up 6 |
| 44 | Leo | 5,629 | down 1 |
| 45 | Michael | 5,220 | up 9 |
| 46 | Lee | 5,158 | up 2 |
| 47 | Herman | 5,064 | up 3 |
| 48 | Anthony | 5,043 | up 30 |
| 49 | Daniel | 5,036 | down 8 |
| 50 | Leonard | 5,022 | up 12 |
| 51 | Floyd | 4,968 | up 2 |
| 52 | Donald | 4,632 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 53 | Kenneth | 4,579 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 54 | Jesse | 4,559 | down 16 |
| 55 | Russell | 4,552 | up 13 |
| 56 | Clyde | 4,524 | up 2 |
| 57 | Oscar | 4,517 | down 20 |
| 58 | Peter | 4,375 | down 7 |
| 59 | Lester | 4,361 | up 10 |
| 60 | Leroy | 4,300 | up 14 |
| 61 | Ray | 4,256 | down 6 |
| 62 | Stanley | 4,156 | up 22 |
| 63 | Clifford | 4,055 | up 7 |
| 64 | Lewis | 4,042 | down 8 |
| 65 | Benjamin | 4,009 | down 18 |
| 66 | Edwin | 3,961 | down 7 |
| 67 | Frederick | 3,900 | down 15 |
| 68 | Chester | 3,788 | down 4 |
| 69 | Claude | 3,704 | down 12 |
| 70 | Eddie | 3,695 | up 15 |
| 71 | Cecil | 3,610 | up 29 |
| 72 | Lloyd | 3,507 | up 5 |
| 73 | Jessie | 3,379 | up 6 |
| 74 | Martin | 3,346 | down 13 |
| 75 | Bernard | 3,296 | up 7 |
| 76 | Tom | 3,293 | down 16 |
| 77 | Will | 3,246 | down 37 |
| 78 | Norman | 3,178 | up 19 |
| 79 | Edgar | 3,154 | down 14 |
| 80 | Harvey | 3,104 | down 13 |
| 81 | Ben | 3,028 | down 18 |
| 82 | Homer | 2,915 | down 10 |
| 83 | Luther | 2,866 | down 12 |
| 84 | Leon | 2,859 | up 4 |
| 85 | Melvin | 2,840 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 86 | Philip | 2,817 | up 1 |
| 87 | Johnnie | 2,781 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 88 | Jim | 2,718 | down 22 |
| 89 | Milton | 2,695 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 90 | Everett | 2,597 | up 6 |
| 91 | Allen | 2,558 | up 1 |
| 92 | Leslie | 2,531 | down 2 |
| 93 | Alvin | 2,484 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 94 | Victor | 2,447 | up 5 |
| 95 | Marvin | 2,324 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 96 | Stephen | 2,247 | not top 100 in 1890s |
| 97 | Alexander | 2,230 | down 4 |
| 98 | Jacob | 2,191 | down 25 |
| 99 | Hugh | 2,176 | down 19 |
| 100 | Patrick | 2,141 | down 14 |
Names that peaked in the 1900s
These were among the decade's top 1,000 and reached their highest share of babies in a year between 1900 and 1909. The year each one peaked is in brackets.
Girls
- Gladys (1901)
- Rose (1908)
- Viola (1908)
- Leona (1905)
- Beulah (1901)
- Opal (1909)
- Velma (1907)
- Inez (1909)
- Lola (1904)
- Alberta (1909)
Boys
- Joe (1907)
- Louis (1908)
- Charlie (1900)
- Sam (1900)
- Leo (1903)
- Lee (1900)
- Clyde (1905)
- Lester (1906)
- Clifford (1908)
- Cecil (1902)
Source: Social Security Administration, national baby name data, data through 2025. Names given to fewer than five babies of one sex in a year aren't published, so totals are a little lower than actual births.