Most Popular Baby Names of the 1890s
Across the 1890s, Mary was the most popular girls' name, given to 131,138 babies, and John led the boys with 80,664.
That's out of 2,221,561 girls and 1,140,947 boys counted between 1890 and 1899, under 2,963 different girls' names and 2,059 boys' names.
Number one, year by year
| Year | Girls | Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 1890 | Mary | John |
| 1891 | Mary | John |
| 1892 | Mary | John |
| 1893 | Mary | John |
| 1894 | Mary | John |
| 1895 | Mary | John |
| 1896 | Mary | John |
| 1897 | Mary | John |
| 1898 | Mary | John |
| 1899 | Mary | John |
Top 100 names of the 1890s
| Rank | Name | Babies | vs 1880s |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary | 131,138 | same |
| 2 | Anna | 55,261 | same |
| 3 | Margaret | 37,937 | up 2 |
| 4 | Helen | 37,802 | up 20 |
| 5 | Elizabeth | 33,879 | down 1 |
| 6 | Ruth | 32,867 | up 60 |
| 7 | Florence | 32,345 | up 5 |
| 8 | Ethel | 31,453 | up 7 |
| 9 | Emma | 28,652 | down 6 |
| 10 | Marie | 25,853 | up 35 |
| 11 | Clara | 25,473 | down 2 |
| 12 | Bertha | 25,125 | down 4 |
| 13 | Minnie | 24,615 | down 7 |
| 14 | Bessie | 24,417 | down 1 |
| 15 | Alice | 24,415 | down 5 |
| 16 | Lillian | 24,106 | up 10 |
| 17 | Edna | 24,068 | up 12 |
| 18 | Grace | 23,804 | down 4 |
| 19 | Annie | 23,122 | down 8 |
| 20 | Mabel | 21,991 | same |
| 21 | Ida | 21,212 | down 14 |
| 22 | Rose | 21,134 | up 6 |
| 23 | Hazel | 20,154 | up 61 |
| 24 | Gertrude | 19,898 | up 3 |
| 25 | Martha | 19,415 | down 7 |
| 26 | Pearl | 19,054 | up 4 |
| 27 | Frances | 18,090 | up 14 |
| 28 | Myrtle | 17,717 | up 9 |
| 29 | Edith | 17,650 | up 2 |
| 30 | Nellie | 17,285 | down 11 |
| 31 | Sarah | 17,154 | down 15 |
| 32 | Ella | 17,072 | down 15 |
| 33 | Eva | 16,460 | up 2 |
| 34 | Laura | 16,433 | down 13 |
| 35 | Elsie | 16,375 | up 20 |
| 36 | Louise | 15,174 | up 2 |
| 37 | Esther | 14,737 | up 49 |
| 38 | Catherine | 14,502 | up 4 |
| 39 | Agnes | 14,429 | up 12 |
| 40 | Carrie | 14,276 | down 18 |
| 41 | Lillie | 14,093 | down 2 |
| 42 | Mildred | 13,792 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 43 | Gladys | 13,622 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 44 | Irene | 13,621 | up 32 |
| 45 | Julia | 13,448 | down 9 |
| 46 | Hattie | 12,909 | down 13 |
| 47 | Cora | 12,880 | down 24 |
| 48 | Lena | 12,491 | down 4 |
| 49 | Josephine | 12,463 | down 2 |
| 50 | Mattie | 12,449 | down 16 |
| 51 | Jennie | 11,876 | down 19 |
| 52 | Jessie | 11,870 | down 12 |
| 53 | Maude | 11,304 | down 28 |
| 54 | Alma | 11,184 | up 13 |
| 55 | Mae | 10,918 | up 8 |
| 56 | Blanche | 10,860 | down 3 |
| 57 | Dorothy | 10,846 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 58 | Ada | 10,379 | down 12 |
| 59 | Lucy | 10,323 | down 10 |
| 60 | Lula | 10,238 | down 17 |
| 61 | Mamie | 10,085 | down 4 |
| 62 | Fannie | 9,898 | down 14 |
| 63 | Stella | 9,807 | down 4 |
| 64 | Katherine | 9,408 | down 10 |
| 65 | Viola | 9,386 | up 16 |
| 66 | Ruby | 8,699 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 67 | Dora | 8,684 | down 17 |
| 68 | Maggie | 8,607 | down 16 |
| 69 | Nora | 8,293 | down 13 |
| 70 | Rosa | 7,881 | down 12 |
| 71 | Beatrice | 7,500 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 72 | Ellen | 7,435 | down 8 |
| 73 | Sadie | 7,398 | down 3 |
| 74 | Marion | 7,310 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 75 | Willie | 7,109 | up 14 |
| 76 | Effie | 6,961 | down 14 |
| 77 | May | 6,880 | down 16 |
| 78 | Beulah | 6,785 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 79 | Pauline | 6,635 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 80 | Nettie | 6,538 | down 15 |
| 81 | Susie | 6,530 | down 8 |
| 82 | Della | 6,410 | down 14 |
| 83 | Vera | 6,377 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 84 | Marguerite | 6,376 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 85 | Daisy | 6,249 | down 25 |
| 86 | Lydia | 5,942 | down 7 |
| 87 | Virginia | 5,864 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 88 | Olive | 5,713 | same |
| 89 | Kathryn | 5,653 | up 5 |
| 90 | Evelyn | 5,648 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 91 | Sallie | 5,580 | down 20 |
| 92 | Lizzie | 5,556 | down 23 |
| 93 | Lottie | 5,499 | down 13 |
| 94 | Emily | 5,476 | down 3 |
| 95 | Georgia | 5,445 | down 10 |
| 96 | Flora | 5,442 | down 21 |
| 97 | Nancy | 5,346 | down 25 |
| 98 | Katie | 5,178 | down 20 |
| 99 | Lucille | 5,105 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 100 | Leona | 5,083 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| Rank | Name | Babies | vs 1880s |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John | 80,664 | same |
| 2 | William | 72,244 | same |
| 3 | James | 50,723 | same |
| 4 | George | 43,358 | same |
| 5 | Charles | 36,848 | same |
| 6 | Joseph | 29,000 | up 1 |
| 7 | Frank | 28,718 | down 1 |
| 8 | Robert | 26,147 | up 1 |
| 9 | Edward | 22,033 | up 2 |
| 10 | Henry | 21,664 | down 2 |
| 11 | Harry | 21,330 | up 1 |
| 12 | Thomas | 21,115 | down 2 |
| 13 | Walter | 19,495 | same |
| 14 | Arthur | 16,349 | same |
| 15 | Fred | 14,270 | same |
| 16 | Albert | 13,753 | same |
| 17 | Clarence | 11,901 | up 1 |
| 18 | Willie | 9,849 | up 12 |
| 19 | Roy | 9,779 | up 6 |
| 20 | Louis | 8,442 | down 1 |
| 21 | Earl | 8,297 | up 15 |
| 22 | Paul | 8,181 | up 22 |
| 23 | Carl | 8,047 | up 10 |
| 24 | Ernest | 7,877 | same |
| 25 | Samuel | 7,857 | down 8 |
| 26 | Raymond | 7,572 | up 31 |
| 27 | Richard | 7,572 | down 4 |
| 28 | Joe | 7,482 | down 7 |
| 29 | David | 7,333 | down 9 |
| 30 | Charlie | 7,261 | down 8 |
| 31 | Harold | 7,018 | up 53 |
| 32 | Ralph | 6,951 | up 10 |
| 33 | Howard | 5,949 | up 7 |
| 34 | Andrew | 5,719 | down 7 |
| 35 | Herbert | 5,660 | up 8 |
| 36 | Elmer | 5,647 | up 2 |
| 37 | Oscar | 5,612 | down 8 |
| 38 | Jesse | 5,396 | down 10 |
| 39 | Alfred | 5,373 | down 4 |
| 40 | Will | 5,210 | down 14 |
| 41 | Daniel | 5,185 | down 10 |
| 42 | Sam | 4,941 | down 8 |
| 43 | Leo | 4,691 | up 38 |
| 44 | Jack | 4,635 | up 22 |
| 45 | Lawrence | 4,597 | up 18 |
| 46 | Francis | 4,535 | up 9 |
| 47 | Benjamin | 4,460 | down 15 |
| 48 | Lee | 4,384 | down 3 |
| 49 | Eugene | 4,303 | up 5 |
| 50 | Herman | 4,232 | down 3 |
| 51 | Peter | 4,028 | down 14 |
| 52 | Frederick | 3,994 | down 13 |
| 53 | Floyd | 3,957 | up 18 |
| 54 | Michael | 3,926 | down 4 |
| 55 | Ray | 3,763 | up 18 |
| 56 | Lewis | 3,699 | down 15 |
| 57 | Claude | 3,636 | down 5 |
| 58 | Clyde | 3,625 | up 1 |
| 59 | Edwin | 3,505 | up 1 |
| 60 | Tom | 3,335 | down 14 |
| 61 | Martin | 3,254 | down 13 |
| 62 | Leonard | 3,166 | up 18 |
| 63 | Ben | 3,156 | down 10 |
| 64 | Chester | 3,021 | up 1 |
| 65 | Edgar | 2,982 | down 4 |
| 66 | Jim | 2,841 | down 15 |
| 67 | Harvey | 2,822 | down 9 |
| 68 | Russell | 2,780 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 69 | Lester | 2,702 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 70 | Clifford | 2,701 | up 27 |
| 71 | Luther | 2,668 | down 3 |
| 72 | Homer | 2,637 | up 6 |
| 73 | Jacob | 2,551 | down 24 |
| 74 | Leroy | 2,544 | up 22 |
| 75 | Otto | 2,543 | down 8 |
| 76 | Guy | 2,487 | down 6 |
| 77 | Lloyd | 2,480 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 78 | Anthony | 2,453 | up 15 |
| 79 | Jessie | 2,424 | up 7 |
| 80 | Hugh | 2,405 | down 6 |
| 81 | Ed | 2,346 | down 19 |
| 82 | Bernard | 2,315 | up 10 |
| 83 | Theodore | 2,300 | down 4 |
| 84 | Stanley | 2,297 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 85 | Eddie | 2,284 | up 13 |
| 86 | Patrick | 2,233 | down 9 |
| 87 | Philip | 2,147 | up 1 |
| 88 | Leon | 2,103 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 89 | Archie | 2,068 | down 2 |
| 90 | Leslie | 2,063 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 91 | Oliver | 2,035 | down 15 |
| 92 | Allen | 2,002 | down 7 |
| 93 | Alexander | 1,954 | down 11 |
| 94 | Dewey | 1,921 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 95 | Ira | 1,916 | down 23 |
| 96 | Everett | 1,902 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 97 | Norman | 1,891 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 98 | Horace | 1,814 | down 8 |
| 99 | Victor | 1,811 | not top 100 in 1880s |
| 100 | Cecil | 1,808 | not top 100 in 1880s |
Names that peaked in the 1890s
These were among the decade's top 1,000 and reached their highest share of babies in a year between 1890 and 1899. The year each one peaked is in brackets.
Girls
- Florence (1893)
- Ethel (1894)
- Marie (1899)
- Lillian (1898)
- Edna (1893)
- Grace (1890)
- Mabel (1891)
- Hazel (1897)
- Gertrude (1896)
- Pearl (1890)
Boys
- Walter (1892)
- Clarence (1895)
- Roy (1897)
- Earl (1894)
- Ernest (1895)
- Elmer (1897)
- Herman (1893)
- Floyd (1897)
- Ray (1896)
- Homer (1893)
Source: Social Security Administration, national baby name data, data through 2025. Names given to fewer than five babies of one sex in a year aren't published, so totals are a little lower than actual births.